Logo

Cloud Object Storage Comparison - AWS S3 vs. Google Cloud Storage Nearline

February 20, 2022

Introduction

Cloud object storage is a popular, scalable, and cost-effective way for businesses to store large amounts of data. AWS S3 and Google Cloud Storage Nearline are two of the leading cloud object storage solutions available today. In this blog post, we will compare the features of AWS S3 and Google Cloud Storage Nearline to help you decide which one is better suited for your needs.

Pricing

Pricing is always a key consideration when it comes to cloud storage. AWS S3 and Google Cloud Storage Nearline both offer competitive pricing models.

AWS S3 charges for data storage, data transfer, and requests. The pricing varies depending on the region, storage class, and frequency of access. For example, the standard storage class in the US East region charges $0.023 per gigabyte for the first 50 TB, while the infrequent access storage class charges $0.0125 per gigabyte.

Google Cloud Storage Nearline follows a similar pricing model. However, the storage cost is slightly lower than AWS S3. For example, in the US East region, Nearline storage costs $0.01 per gigabyte per month. Data retrieval from Nearline costs $0.01 per gigabyte, which is similar to S3.

Overall, Google Cloud Storage Nearline is slightly cheaper than AWS S3, especially for long-term storage needs.

Performance

Both AWS S3 and Google Cloud Storage Nearline provide high-performance object storage systems. However, AWS S3 offers faster data transfer rates and lower latency than Google Cloud Storage Nearline.

AWS S3 has a network of edge locations globally that serve content from the closest location to the end-user. In contrast, Google Cloud Storage Nearline offers limited CDN support, which can result in slower content delivery.

Durability and Availability

AWS S3 and Google Cloud Storage Nearline both provide highly durable and highly available storage options.

AWS S3 offers four different storage classes that provide different levels of durability and availability. The standard storage class provides 99.999999999% durability, while the infrequent access storage class provides 99.99% availability.

In comparison, Google Cloud Storage Nearline provides 99.999999999% durability, which is similar to AWS S3's standard storage class. However, it provides lower availability of 99%.

Security

Both AWS S3 and Google Cloud Storage Nearline provide robust security features to protect stored objects.

AWS S3 provides a range of features, including server-side encryption, bucket policies, access control lists, and identity and access management (IAM) roles. It also offers AWS Key Management Service (KMS) to manage data encryption keys.

Google Cloud Storage Nearline provides similar security features, including server-side encryption, bucket IAM policies, and access control lists. It also offers Cloud Identity and Access Management (IAM) to manage access to buckets and objects.

Conclusion

AWS S3 and Google Cloud Storage Nearline provide reliable, scalable, and cost-effective cloud object storage solutions. The choice between the two depends on the specific needs of your business.

If you require high-performance storage and faster data transfer rates, AWS S3 may be the better choice. However, if you're looking for a more cost-effective solution that provides excellent long-term storage options, Google Cloud Storage Nearline is a great choice.

References

© 2023 Flare Compare